Dilworth’s Decomposition Theorem for Posets1

نویسنده

  • Piotr Rudnicki
چکیده

The following theorem is due to Dilworth [12]: Let P be a partially ordered set. If the maximal number of elements in an independent subset (anti-chain) of P is k, then P is the union of k chains (cliques). In this article we formalize an elegant proof of the above theorem for finite posets by Perles [17]. The result is then used in proving the case of infinite posets following the original proof of Dilworth [12]. A dual of Dilworth’s theorem also holds: a poset with maximum clique m is a union of m independent sets. The proof of this dual fact is considerably easier; we follow the proof by Mirsky [16]. Mirsky states also a corollary that a poset of r × s + 1 elements possesses a clique of size r + 1 or an independent set of size s + 1, or both. This corollary is then used to prove the result of Erdős and Szekeres [13]. Instead of using posets, we drop reflexivity and state the facts about antisymmetric and transitive relations.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Formalization of some central theorems in combinatorics of finite sets

We present fully formalized proofs of some central theorems from combinatorics. These are Dilworth’s decomposition theorem, Mirsky’s theorem, Hall’s marriage theorem and the Erdős-Szekeres theorem. Dilworth’s decomposition theorem is the key result among these. It states that in any finite partially ordered set (poset), the size of a smallest chain cover and a largest antichain are the same. Mi...

متن کامل

Fully Mechanized Proofs of Dilworths Theorem and Mirskys Theorem

We present two fully mechanized proofs of Dilworth’s and Mirsky’s theorems in the Coq proof assistant. Dilworth’s Theorem states that in any finite partially ordered set (poset), the size of a smallest chain cover and a largest antichain are the same. Mirsky’s Theorem is a dual of Dilworth’s Theorem. We formalize the proofs by Perles [2] (for Dilworth’s Theorem) and by Mirsky [5] (for the dual ...

متن کامل

Computing a minimal partition of partial orders into heapable subsets

We investigate the partitioning of partial orders into a minimal number of heapable subsets. We prove a characterization result reminiscent of the proof of Dilworth’s theorem, which yields as a byproduct a flow-based algorithm for computing such a minimal decomposition. On the other hand, in the particular case of sets and sequences of intervals we prove that this minimal decomposition can be c...

متن کامل

A New Proof of Berge’s Strong Path Partition Conjecture for Acyclic Digraphs

Berge’s elegant strong path partition conjecture from 1982 extends the Greene-Kleitman Theorem and Dilworth’s Theorem for all digraphs. The conjecture is known to be true for all digraphs for k = 1 by the Gallai-Milgram Theorem, and for k > 1 only for acyclic digraphs. We present a simple algorithmic proof for k = 1 which naturally extends to a new algorithmic proof for acyclic digraphs for all...

متن کامل

Online Algorithms for Dilworth’s Chain Partition

There are many interesting applications of partial order theory in distributed and parallel systems. These include testing and monitoring the concurrent behaviour of the system. Dilworth’s chain partition and width of the partial order plays a key role when the trace is modelled as such. In this paper, we discuss the desicion problem of testing the width of a partially ordered set, and finding ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009